Teens get sucked in
http://www.smh.com.au/news/cancer/teens-get-sucked-in/2006/08/23/1156012605636.html
Hook 'em young ... tobacco companies
are the target of the satirical movie Thank You for Smoking.
Six of the top 10 films most attractive to teenagers this year have featured smoking and one, Click, has so much smoking it's the equivalent of two 30-second ads, says Anita Tang, director of health strategies at the Cancer Council of NSW.
"Teenagers are strongly influenced by seeing tobacco smoking in movies," Tang says. "They are more likely to experiment with smoking and think more positively about it after seeing smoking in movies."
That's why the Cancer Council is calling on the NSW Government to amend the Public Health Act so anti-smoking ads are screened before youth-targeted movies showing smoking.
"Counter-ads help inoculate young people against the influence of seeing actors light up on the big screen," Tang says. "They leave teenage viewers less approving of smoking and, for those who smoke, more likely to think about quitting."
Movies are one of the last legal ways to promote tobacco, which may explain why smoking in movies began to soar during the mid-1990s when electronic advertising was being phased out. Actors lit a cigarette every 10 to 15 minutes in the '70s and '80s, by the '90s they lit up every one to three minutes, according to the Cancer Council's Screen Out Smoking campaign. By 2002, rates were similar to those of the 1950s.
"We should start bribing directors in Hollywood to screen smoking in movies," proclaims central character Nick Naylor in the film Thank You for Smoking, a satirical expose of the life of a tobacco lobbyist. The scene is a tense meeting of tobacco industry executives who have gathered to solve the serious problem of declining smoking rates.
"The number of teens smoking is falling like a ship from heaven," bemoans a tobacco baron. Naylor impresses his colleagues with his slick solution: "We need to put the sex back into cigarettes and put smoking back onto the screen."
Viewers may smile, but it's so close to the truth it isn't funny. US tobacco industry documents have shown the industry has paid large amounts to have its products appear in movies and TV series. Sylvester Stallone, for example, was paid $500,000 to use Brown and Williamson products in no fewer than five feature films. And $350,000 was paid to have Lark cigarettes appear in the James Bond movie Licence to Kill.
Paying actors to smoke is no longer
legal. But paid or not, stars who smoke in movies are as influential as
any advertising campaign, if not more so.