![]() Can Democracy Survive the Media? (September 2004) Forum in Washington gathers top media researchers in a discussion of the role of the media in the political process |
|
|
In August, the 16 so-called swing states received more campaign coverage than the rest of the 50 states combined. But with a disproportional amount of the news coverage focusing on Ohio, Florida and other swings states, voters in the rest of the country are easily discouraged and the value of their votes is understated. This is one of the conclusions presented last Tuesday, September 28, at a forum entitled "Media Coverage and the U.S. Presidential Campaign: Can Democracy Survive the Media?" Promoted by the German Marshall Fund of the United States and the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, the forum discussed the role of the media in the political process of the ongoing U.S. presidential campaign. Roland Schatz presented data from the Media Tenor Institute. Among the commentators were Robert Lichter from the Center for Media and Public Affairs, Scott Keeter from The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, Marvin Kalb from Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Harriet Fulbright from Fulbright Association, Edward Luttwak from the Center for Strategic and International Studies and Holli Semetko from the Claus M. Halle Institute for Global Learning. Other key findings from Media Tenor discussed in the forum: Women absent in
political and business reports Networks fail to
report on public's top concern Portrayal of
economy does not correspond to facts Congress under
media attack: Hardly visible, with negative ratings The graphics illustrating this release can be downloaded at: www.mediatenor.com/democ04.pdf
Ms. |